Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
I need to a professional letter written to my employer MTA New York City Transit (Buses) expressing how degrading, violated, embarrassed I felt when two co-workers called me to ask me if I had previously called out for having a UTI. I was shocked, confused and I felt humiliated that I need to explain to my coworkers the reason I called out (I need this letter to be written extremely dramatic) because I am almost certain I am going to get a lawyer to take further actions. Explain the HIPPA law and why what they did violated my privacy.
I did not call out for having a UTI, I called out for having stomach cramps which was listed on the posted paper. However, I understood after seeing the list why they made an honest mistake. At first glance it really does look like the UTI was lined up with my name. The person that have the UTI is listed directly above my name. Needless to say, our personal information was not to be displayed for others to have access to.
This list was posted in the GENERAL PUBLIC of the building to remind us that we need to bring documentation for the absence of our sickness.
The list entails
1. First and last names
2.Pass Number (Id #)
3. Sick Status (which tells if the employee is in a good or bad status) mine is listed as BAD which is nobody else business to know.
4. Sick Time Balance (how many sick days that employee have in the bank)
5. Regular Days Off
6. The date of absence
7. The date resume work
8. The date the doctors document is due
9. Total day absent
10. Description of sickness listed (Stomach ache, Diarrhea, UTI, Gout, Fever ect… )
I was told that the General manager for my bus depot got wind of the fact that someone from management posted our personal information on the bulletin board and she ripped it down and replaced it with a more acceptable list. Excluding number’s 3, 4, 10…. but the damage was already done.
I kept thinking all day… what if I had a really bad medical issue such as AIDS or herpes or anything embarrassing… they would of posted it carelessly just as they did the person with the UTI and diarrhea.
As of today, I do not feel as though my private information is secure with this company. They have betrayed my trust (please be sure to include that).
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |