Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Visual Analysis of a Work of Art
For your major essay, you will compose a (minimum) 1000-word visual analysis of a work of art of your choosing. There is no penalty for going over 1000 words (it may take more than 1000 to say everything you need to say), but you must meet this minimum threshold. Thorough coverage of all the applicable techniques is the goal. The Art- The Scream from Edvard Munch You may choose any work of art; you may choose a work covered in class or one that you find on your own.
(You will be presenting on the same work of art in your Pecha Kucha – these are two parts of the same major project.) The Paper The paper should be typed, and double spaced, and should follow ALL the guidelines outlined in the Requirements and Tips handout. 99% of what you need to know about my expectations for written work is there. If your paper conforms to everything outlined in the handout, you’re good to go.
You are not required to do any research for this paper, but if you choose to do research to further your own ideas, you MUST properly cite all sources. See the Requirements handout. The Content of the Paper Your paper should be a really straightforward visual analysis of the work you’ve chosen. Try to discern the meaning of the work though applying all the applicable principles and terms of analysis to it.
Talk about how the artist uses line, color, light, emphasis, etc…. Units I – IV give you the tools you need to analyze a work of art with authority. Try to cover all the principles of analysis, but only if they actually are used in the work. This is your opportunity to demonstrate that you understand how to analyze a work of art by employing correct techniques and utilizing the appropriate vocabulary.
Your ultimate goal is to try and communicate that you understand what the work of art is about through your analysis of its visual form (first and foremost) and subject matter. What the Paper Shouldn’t Include Biography of the artist, art historical information, etc. This is a visual paper, no need to talk about historian. Make sure you can find a good image of your work either online or in a book. It’s hard to write a visual analysis of a work of art you can’t see clearly!
Visual Analysis of a Work of Art
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Visual Analysis of a Work of Art |
Visual Analysis of a Work of Art