Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
State of the Question Today Discussion Cohort 5
Reading:
Nilson, James Baldwins Challenge, 884-902
Massingale, The Vocation of a Black Catholic Theologian, 151-174
Nothwehr, Introduction, Papal, Conciliar, Vatican, and North America, 105-123 (skim 110-123), 181-202
Massingale, An Analysis of Catholic Social Teaching on Racism, 43-82
Canvas Reading Journal
Fr. Bryan Massingale, SJ begins his analysis by comparing the set of resolutions created by the Federated Colored Catholics at the 1930 convention with those proposed in 1933 LaFarge and 12 white college students who took over the Federation. Led by black Catholic layman Thomas Wyatt Turner, the first set of concerns were intended to express how too often issues related to the colored are discussed without any contribution from the people themselves. In a series of conventions held between 1924-1932, this group pressed for an end to [Black] exclusion from the normal life of the Catholic Church in America manifested in racially segregated churches and barriers to admission to Catholics schools, organizations, and hospitals
Questions:
How does Massingale compare and contrast the proposals made by Black Catholics with those created by white Catholic liberals at that time?
How does he argue for the presence of this tension in further documents created by the Church in 1958, 1968, and 1979?
Using citations: (author, abbreviation of the file without authors name, page #). Ex: the citation for Massingale, An Analysis of Catholic Social Teaching on Racism file would be (Massingale, AACSTR, pg. 8). For the references you take from the texts, I want you to write those references exactly the same as they were written in the texts (word by word).
State of the Question Today Discussion Cohort 5
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
State of the Question Today Discussion Cohort 5 |
State of the Question Today Discussion Cohort 5