Working knowledge of the project
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
What is the purpose of this tool? The purpose of the project charter is to describe the performance improvement rationale, goals, barriers, and anticipated resources to which the team will commit.?
How can the tool help you? Upon completion of the project charter, the project team will have the following:
Working knowledge of the project.
Specific performance measures and targeted improvement goals.
Identified organizational forces that may promote or impede project success.
Instruction Steps
Describe the project scope and provide goal statement. Some questions that can be addressed in the scope include whether this is a pilot project or will be implemented throughout the hospital. Which units will this project affect? Are certain service lines being included? What patient population will be included??
Document the case for change; list the key business reasons for initiating the project, specifically stating the business problem.?
List the performance measures and baseline performance data. Set a performance goal for each measure.
List the project milestones that will guide your team in keeping on track. Milestones are major points in a project lifecycle. Some milestones for improvement projects could be the development of a tool or policy or completion of staff training on a new procedure.?
Consider factors that are potential barriers to success such as resistance to change, resource limitations, or time constraints.
List the individuals or groups who will be affected by these strategies; include stakeholders.
If you are working with a team, choose team members based on stakeholder analysis.
List any additional resources that will be needed to complete the project.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow