Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
assessments discussion
Everything must be in APA format
4. EXPLAIN WHAT A SYMPTOM IS AND WHAT A SIGN IS. GIVE EXAMPLES OF EACH
5. How do NURSES USE VITAL SIGNS AND PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT FOR NURSING DIAGNOSES?
6. How do NURSES INCORPORATE PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS WHEN THEY WRITE GOALS?
7. How do NURSES USE DATA FROM PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT IN IMPLEMENTING CARE? PRIORITIZING CARE?
8. How do NURSES USE PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS WHEN COMMUNICATING PATIENT PLANS OF CARE?
9. How do NURSES USE VITAL SIGN FINDINGS TO ASSIGN PATIENTS TO OTHER LPNS AND NURSING ASSISTANTS?
10. Why is it important to ASSESS BP LYING, SITTING AND STANDING? WHAT PATIENTS NEED THEIR BPS CHECKED THIS WAY?
11. WHY IS ASSESSMENT OF MOBILITY IMPORTANT TO ALL ASPECTS OF PATIENT CARE?
12. Reference page
POWERPOINT REFERENCES IN APA FORMAT
assessments discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
assessments discussion