Writing the authors assignment and discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Writing the authors assignment and discussion
I have two assignment. The first one is discussion so I choose the author name Priscilla Wilkins his notes about the publication is “Priscilla is a columnist, reporting on schools in Oak Hills. She grew up in a big city, but moved to this small town to teach history at Oak Hills High School. However, she and the principal George Stormoen got into many disagreements over teaching practices and school organization. She believed that the school was wasteful in how they spent money, that the teachers did not hold very high standards for the students, and that there was a general disorganization for all school events. She eventually quit her teaching position a few years ago and got a job writing news reports for Oak Hills Educator.” I have 4 questions to answer them using the author notes. The story is THE SHOW MUST GO ON this related to the discussion so you have to read it and then read the notes for the author and then answer the questions. The questions are
Are there any people involved with the school or play that the author may like or dislike? What is the connection? What feelings do you think the author has toward this person/ group?
Is there anyone the author may be trying to blame or trying to protect from receiving blame for the fire? Who and why?
What do you think might be the highlights or most important part of the story for this author?
What do you think may be the least important part, or a part the author may want to avoid mentioning?
The second assignment is After reading The Show Must Go On and discussing your author’s perspective, it’s time to write a short news report.
WRITING ASSIGNMENT
Directions:
Write a short news report about what happened on the evening of May 13, 2019. This is a news story giving facts and information. It should not give opinion or theory, but it should be written with a limited and biased perspective. This should give enough information to the audience who dont know anything about the fire.
Write from the perspective and with the bias of your author and publication (meaning spend more time and coverage on the things that are most important to you, and little or no time on the things you don’t care about)
Write around 200 words (2-3 short paragraphs)
Use big main ideas in the first paragraph
Give smaller details in the second and third paragraphs
Use your own words/ synonyms (dont copy from the original story)
Format like a newspaper with a title, author and date, and with short paragraphs
Create and use quotes or statements from anyone the author may have interviewed
Make sure to have a catchy headline
Include the name of the person from 10.10 whose perspective you are writing from. I will know who you actually are when you upload the file.
Use the example story The Show Must Go On in 10.10 as your guide (but yours can be shorter).
If you don’t understand just ask me.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Writing the authors assignment and discussion
Writing the authors assignment and discussion