Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Please precisely describe what additional information is required. Thank you! Using AHP analysis, select the best vacation home based on the four decision criteria and their associated priorities/weights listed below. Vacation property A is a 3-hour drive from home, has average quality swimming, should be relatively low maintenance (about $500 per summer), with a purchase price of $200,000. Vacation property B is a 5-hour drive from home, has good quality swimming but will require a little more maintenance (about $725 per summer). Its purchase price is $175,000. Vacation property C is a four-hour drive from home has great water for swimming but is a little heavy on the maintenance ($1250) per summer. Its purchase price is $300,000. Using travel time (quantitative), maintenance cost (quantitative) and swimming quality (qualitative) and cost (quantitative) as the four decision criteria, complete an AHP analysis to select the best vacation home: A, B or C. Be sure to complete all consistency ratio (CR) calculations and make adjustments if necessary. Consider a CR less than 0.10 to be sufficiently consistent.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow