Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Using Microsoft Visio, create an entity-relationship (E-R) diagram for the scenario that you selected from Hands-On Database and based on the information you produced when completing the “To Do” activities from Chapter 3 (for the scenario activity in this module).
Scenarios WiLD WooD ApArTmenTS
The Wild Wood Management team is ready to see some results. You have a meeting with them at the end of the week. It is time to analyze and organize all the information. Look back at the material from earlier chapters.
To do
1. Make a list of issues with the current system.
2. Make a list of the database requirements for each stake-
holder involved in the database.
3. Make a list of business rules.
4. List some major security rules for the database.
5. Take a look at each of the forms, and make a list of all the nouns in them. Do the same for the interview, the ques- tionnaire, and the Job Shadow Report. Then set up some preliminary entities and attributes.
6. Identify some candidate keys.
7. Documentation: Store the list of the requirements and
business rules in your database notebook.
(Conger 60)
Conger, Steve. Hands-On Database, 2nd Edition. Pearson, 20150612. VitalBook file.
The citation provided is a guideline. Please check each citation for accuracy before use.
(Conger 60)
Conger, Steve. Hands-On Database, 2nd Edition. Pearson, 20150612. VitalBook file.
The citation provided is a guideline. Please check each citation for accuracy before use.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow