Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
For this week’s assignment, you will have multiple requirements. First you will select an IT policy lifecycle. Thinking about the course case study, consider the most appropriate Lifecycle to help drive policy. You can select a lifecycle that has already been developed, or you may create your own. State the name of your lifecycle, provide a visual if available and walk through the phases/stages of the lifecycle.
Next, use the lifecycle to drive a selection for a Policy Framework for your plan that will be applied to PYZ Tech. Create, define, and discuss how the policy will be managed. Continue to keep your governance framework and the outline of areas that should be included with these types of plans in mind.
The IT policy framework can be similar to the governance framework in structure, but it should have a focus on policy and procedures. This can be a visual or a narrative component to the assignment. Remember to always include some narrative explanation when providing visuals as a component to the overall plan.
Note: I am uploading a picture of lifecycle I have selected. Write the assignment accordingly
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow