Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The first step in increasing your productivity is to know how you spend your time. You should invest two or three days to track your time and the way you spend it. Ideally, you should pause every hour or two and tabulate how much time you’ve spent on particular tasks. Identify the activities that consume the greatest amounts of your time. You may be surprised by the percentage of your time that is unrelated to school and/or work. Next is to only touch things once. You need to decide the first time you touch it, that is open an email or listen to a voice mail, that you are either going to take action now, delegate it, or delete it. You should set specific times in the day when you’ll check and tend to emails, texts, and voice mails. By turning off notifications, you can wait to respond to your messages to when it is your set time for these types of tasks. You will want to take regular breaks. Plan your work in 90-minute intervals and then recharge with a walk, music, or a brief chat to improve your concentration and boost productivity. Finally, see if some of the time you currently spend playing video games or connecting on social media can be reallocated to work activities. If you have time that you can use more productivity, save your social media or gaming time to set times of the day.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|