Evidence of Potential Interventions and Synthesis of Evidence Papers
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evidence of Potential Interventions and Synthesis of Evidence Papers
This is a continuation from the last few weeks.
Part A
Evidence for Potential Interventions to Mitigate the Negative Impact of One Challenge – 2 Pages with references.
Search the research literature to find three peer-reviewed studies that focus on interventions currently being conducted to mitigate the negative effect of the challenge you identified in Week 5 as the best opportunity for EBP improvement in a potential doctoral capstone project.
Use the following questions to guide your search for and review of the evidence substantiating potential interventions:
Which improvement activities or actions are currently being undertaken, according to the literature?
Is overarching guidance being provided to improve the situation, according to the literature?
What are potential interventions that an organization could implement to improve the situation?
Attach a draft review and synthesis of evidence for all three of the peer-reviewed studies. Provide full APA-formatted references for your selected studies and include a description of the identified organizational challenge.
Part B
SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE SUBSTANTIATING POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS – 3-4 pages with current peer reviewed refences.
Instructions
Find and synthesize evidence that supports potential interventions to mitigate the negative effect of the organizational challenge you identified in Week 5 as the focus of a prospective doctoral capstone project. Then, substantiate the applicability of the interventions to the organization, populations served, or both. In addition, substantiate the efficacy of the improvement intervention you think is the best candidate for a capstone project.
Requirements
The assignment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format, length, and supporting evidence.
Summarize a search strategy for evidence supporting improvement interventions for one organizational challenge.
Summarize the significance of the identified challenge and need for improvement.
Briefly describe your search strategy and methods.
Include total search results, results by search term, and both inclusion and exclusion criteria results.
Synthesize research evidence to support potential improvement interventions for one organizational challenge.
Describe how the evidence from the studies you selected applies to the challenge.
Compare evidence from the studies that supports potential interventions.
Discuss the importance, relevance, and significance of specific aspects of the evidence related to potential interventions.
Substantiate the applicability of potential improvement interventions to the organization or population.
Describe ways in which potential interventions specifically apply to the type of organization or the characteristics of a population.
Compare anticipated outcomes of potential interventions with the mission and goals of the organization and the expectations of stakeholders.
Substantiate that the potential interventions can be implemented at a specific organization to facilitate improvements that mitigate the negative impact of the challenge.
Defend your choice of one evidence-based intervention, appropriate for a prospective doctoral capstone project, to mitigate the negative effect of the organizational challenge.
Describe the quality and level of evidence supporting your chosen intervention.
Present an argument to support a doctoral capstone project focused on the implementation of your chosen intervention.
Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Evidence of Potential Interventions and Synthesis of Evidence Papers
Evidence of Potential Interventions and Synthesis of Evidence Papers