Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Economic Impacts of the Russia Ukraine War Term Paper
These are the readings we have done in the course. I am sending this to you to simply to help give you an idea of a good topic for an eventual 10-15 page page paper I will write from this research brief.
Blattman C. and E. Miguel (2010) “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (1): 3-57.
Week 2. The correlates of war (proximate causes): economic growth and income shocks
Miguel E., Satyanath S. and E. Sergenti (2004) “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An
Instrumental Variable Approach.” Journal of Political Economy, 112(4):725-753.
Chassang, Sylvain and Gerard Padró i Miquel (2009). “Economic Shocks and Civil War”
Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4: 211-228.
Week 3. The correlates of war (proximate causes): the rapacity effect
Dube, O. and J.F. Vargas (2016) “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from
Colombia.” Review of Economic Studies, 80(4): 1384-1421.
Nunn, N. and N. Qian (2014) “US Food Aid and Civil Conflict.” American Economic Review,
104(6): 1630-1666.
Week 4. The correlates of war (proximate causes): ethnic conflict
Esteban, J., L. Mayoral and D. Ray (2012) “Ethnicity and Conflict: An Empirical Study.”
American Economic Review, 102(4): 1310-1342.
Durante, R. and E. Zhuravskaya (2018) “Attack When the World Is Not Watching? US News
and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” Journal of Political Economy, 126(3): 1085-1133.
Week 5. The individual decision to participate in war
Rogall, T. (2021) “Mobilizing the Masses for Genocide.” American Economic Review, 111(1):
41-72.
Humpreys, M. and J.M. Weinstein (2008) “Who Fights? The Determinants of Civil War.”
American Journal of Political Science, 52(2): 436-455.
Week 6. Counterinsurgency
Berman, E., J.H. Felter and J. N. Shapiro (2011) “Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The
Economics of Counterinsurgency in Iraq.” Journal of Political Economy, 119(4): 766-819.
Lyall, J., G. Blair and K. Imai (2013) “Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A
Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review, 107(4): 679-705.
Week 7. Natural Resources and War
Guidolin, M., and E. La Ferrara (2007) “Diamonds Are Forever, Wars Are Not: Is Conflict Bad
for Private Firms?” American Economic Review, 97 (5): 1978-1993.
Berman, N., M. Couttenier, D. Rohner, and M. Thoenig. 2017. “This Mine Is Mine! How
Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa.” American Economic Review, 107 (6): 1564-1610.
Week 8. Discussion of Research Briefs
Week 9. Yale Spring Break
II. The economic legacies of conflict
Justino, P. (2012) “War and Poverty” in The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace
and Conflict (eds. Garkfinkel M.R. and S. Skarpedas).
Week 10. Human Capital: Education
León, G. (2012) “Civil Conflict and Human Capital Accumulation: The Long-Term Effects of
Political Violence in Perú.” Journal of Human Resources, 47(4): 991-1022.
Valente, C. (2014) “Education and Civil Conflict in Nepal.” World Bank Economic Review,
28(2): 354-383.
Week 11. Human Capital: Health
Camacho, A. (2008) “Stress and Birth Weight: Evidence from Terrorist Attacks.” American
Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 98(2): 511-515. + Verwimp, P. (2012)
“Undernutrition, Subsequent Risk of Mortality and Civil War in Burundi.” Economics and
Human Biology, 10: 221-231.
Reynal-Querol, M. and J. G. Montalvo (2007) “Fighting against malaria: prevent wars while
waiting for the miraculous vaccines).” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (1): 165-177.
Week 12. Local institutions: participation in organization and collective action
Bellows, J. and E. Miguel (2009) “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal
of Public Economics 93(11-12): 1144-1157.
Acemoglu, D., J.A. Robinson, and R. Santos (2013). “The Monopoly of Violence: Evidence
from Colombia.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1): 5-44.
Week 13. Aggregate Economic Consequences
Abadie A. and J. Gardeazabal (2003). “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the
Basque Country.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 113-132.
Besley, T. and H. Mueller (2012). “Estimating the Peace Dividend: The Impact of Violence
on House Prices in Ireland”, American Economic Review 102(2): 810-833.
Week 14. IDP and Refugees
Altindag, O., O. Bakis and S. Rozo (2020). “Blessing or burden? Impacts of Refugees on
Businesses and the Informal Economy”, Journal of Development Economics, 146: 1-22.
Engel, S. y A.M. Ibáñez (2007). “Displacement Due to Violence in Colombia: A Household
Level Analysis”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(2): 335-365.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Economic Impacts of the Russia Ukraine War Term Paper |
Economic Impacts of the Russia Ukraine War Term Paper