GB560 Evaluate Change Management Plans Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
GB560 Evaluate Change Management Plans Essay
GB560, Evaluate, Change, Management, Plans, Essay
In this Assessment you will provide a critical evaluation of a business process in the scenario provided. The final response for this Assignment will be a 15–17-slide-powerpoint presentation with audio.
The audio portion transcript is found in the notes section below each slide. The presentation includes a cover slide, abstract, body addressing the checklist items, and APA citations and references.
Background: Mohammed Yunus is the founder of the concept of microfinancing. His initial impetus to provide financing to individual small family owned businesses in India and elsewhere inspired a movement that has spread across the world with some controversy as to the real benefits of such financing. See the founder’s website for some background on microfinancing.
In addition, you practiced with some of Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in the Learning Activity that you will now use to address any cultural considerations in your evaluation of the business process described.
Scenario: You were recently hired by a nonprofit organization that is headquartered in Montreal, Canada. This organization, Beacon of Hope (BOH), had a mission of providing financing to businesses who wished to start a business in third world countries.
Two years ago, they changed their mission to providing microfinancing to individuals in third world countries who want to start up a small business in their own country. The first two countries they focused on were Angola and Ghana. After two years in operation, it has become apparent that a change is necessary. Choose either Angola or Ghana to evaluate the organization’s current process addressing the following concerns:
Here are some of the reported problems:
- Only 225 applications were received from prospects concerning each of the two countries. At the 2-year mark, the expectation was 1200 applications for each.
- The application processing time is taking 4–6 months. The original goal was 2 months.
- Only 100 applications have been approved for each country, and the average loan is $10,000.
- The most recent report shows that only 15% of the businesses funded are still in operation.
- Accessing the microfinancing funds has proven problematic using in-country banks.
- Accounting for the expenditure of funds by BOH has been difficult to track.
- Loan delinquency is a major concern due to business failure.
Checklist: Evaluate the business change process by researching and addressing the following:
- Provide an overall assessment of the existing program and what needs to be changed to be viable.
- Analyze the likely reasons that the application processing time for microfinancing is taking 4–6 months.
- Identify the stakeholders who should be involved in this change management process and explain BOH’s responsibility towards these stakeholders. HINT: A stakeholder is any person, group, or organization that has a positive or negative impact on the work or anyone who might be affected by the outcome.
- Explain how you will evaluate success once your proposed plan is in place.
- The professional presentation should include a cover slide, abstract slide, body of the presentation addressing the checklist items, with APA citations and references (i.e., separate references slide).
- Submit your 15–17-slide professional powerpoint presentation with audio including an audio transcript in the form of notes added below each slide. The presentation includes a cover slide, abstract, body addressing the checklist items, and APA citations and references and uses Standard English, correct spelling, and grammar.
If work submitted for this Competency Assessment does not meet the minimum submission requirements, it will be returned without being scored.
CRITERIA MET NOT MET
-Addressing the provided scenario: Provides an overall assessment of the existing program and what needs to be changed to be viable.
-Analyzes the likely reasons that the application processing time for microfinancing is taking 4–6 months.
-Identifies the stakeholders who should be involved in this change management process and explains BOH’s responsibility towards these stakeholders.
-Explains how each step would be executed in the change management process to make it viable.
-Explains how he/she will evaluate success once the proposed plan is in place.
[Explains in detail what obstacles might prevent the success of the program upon evaluation and what possible remedies there might be.]
Overall # Bold Criteria Met/Not Met
[Overall # Mastery Criteria Met/Not Met]
The criterion statements in bold are the minimum requirement to show competent performance on the course outcome; all bold criteria must be met to pass this Course Outcome.
The criterion statements in [Brackets] represent mastery achievement. A predefined number of mastery criteria must be achieved to earn an A grade, indicating mastery of the Course Outcome.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
GB560 Evaluate Change Management Plans Essay