Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question for Environmental Science Discussion
The most recent edition of the APA manual must be used to format and cite your assignment!
Select a nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological agent or toxin of particular interest to you and write a clear, extensive, and broad evaluation of your choice that illustrates your scholarly comprehension of the threat posed by the chosen agent.
You must discuss and expound on the following at a minimum in the form of a clear, organized, and consistent narrative:
Give the agent’s name and a brief description of its history. Give an example of when the agent was employed.
Describe the agent’s physical, chemical, and biological properties.
Discuss the agent’s negative impact identify its mechanism of action how does it cause harm?
Discuss the protective equipment that first responders should use when dealing with the selected agent, as well as clearly indicating (based on your own research) commercially available detection devices (at least two) that could be used by Consequence Management responding agencies to detect the agent.
List any treaties or rules that apply to the agent and/or restrict or govern its availability or usage.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question for Environmental Science Discussion |
Question for Environmental Science Discussion