Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
A Soldier’s View of the Revolutionary War
This week we are reading 3 perspectives on the American Revolution: Joseph Plumb Martin, “A Soldier’s View of the Revolutionary War”; Boston King, “Choosing Sides”; and Catherine Van Cortlandt, “Secret Correspondence of a Loyalist Wife.” Joseph Plumb Martin was a young, free, white American soldier who fought for independence. Boston King was an African American slave who sided with the British. Catherine Van Cortlandt was the wife of a Loyalist and did not have any political rights. These 3 people provide 3 different perspectives and interpretations of the exact same historical event.
After reading their first-hand accounts, explain how the gender, race, and social class identities of the writers shaped their experiences during the war.
What unique struggles—unique due to the writer’s social class status, gender, or race—did each of these people face?
How has reading their first-hand accounts changed your previous opinions or assumptions about the American Revolution? For example, does the independence movement now seem less romantic and idealistic after reading about what Joseph, Boston, and Catherine experienced during the war?
Minimum length is 1,000 words.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results