ability to critically evaluate the material
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Essay Question:
Please answer the following essay question. You will be graded on clarity, accuracy, and your ability to critically evaluate the material. Your essay must be typed, double-spaced, and free of spelling
errors. Your essay should be no longer than two to three pages. You will only need the textbooks and class notes to answer the question. Students should avoid using any other outside sources. Any
additional sources that contribute to your paper must be cited via footnotes or other references. You may not use direct quotes. You are being graded on your understanding of the material, so
explain the view of the author in your own words. *Any student caught plagiarizing will fail the course—see the syllabus.* Students may email me or visit me during office hours to discuss strategies
for completing the essay. Essays are due the day of the exam. Essays must be handed to me in class. No emailed copies will be accepted. No late papers will be accepted.
Criticize the argument presented by EITHER Thomson or Marquis.
Part I: Begin by telling me which author you are criticizing. Next, summarize the author’s general argument. Start by stating the general conclusion of the argument, and then explain the premises in
support of the author’s view. Discuss any ethical theories that might support the argument you are criticizing. Give your own examples to help explain the author’s view. Remember to present the
argument in its strongest form. Be sure to include any responses to objections that the author considers in the argument.
Part II: Give at least one objection to the author’s view. You need to explain why one or more of the author’s premise(s) is/are false or explain why the premises do not give enough support for the
conclusion. Discuss any ethical theories or principles that might support your objection. Be sure to give examples to help make your position clear. You will be graded on clarity and accuracy, so give
as much detail as possible, and be sure that you are criticizing the author’s actual view. You may not use an objection presented by the author, unless you are criticizing the author’s response to that
objection. Try to use your own examples in explaining your objection rather than examples we discussed in class.
ability to critically evaluate the material
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow ability to critically evaluate the material