Accumulated Depreciation Question Description Discussion Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Accumulated Depreciation Question Description Discussion Assignment
Answer: 13 September 20X1: Accumulated depreciation – Building 8,000,000 Building 8,000,000 [to offset the accumulated depreciation against the building’s cost] 15 September 20X1: Loss on asset held for sale 2,000,000 Building 2,000,000 [to write down the building to its estimated fair value of $10 million] 24 September 20X1: Loss on asset held for sale 600,000 Building 600,000 [to write down the building by the estimated amount of contingent commission] Building held for sale (current asset) 9,400,000 Building 9,400,000 [to reclassify as current] 31 December 20X1: Loss on asset held for sale 1,410,000 Building held for sale 1,410,000 [further write-down from $9.4 million to revaluation of $7.99 million, net of 6% commission] 31 March 20X2: Building held for sale 2,010,000 Gain (recovery) on asset held for sale 2,010,000 [to record the increase in estimated fair value, up to the restore previous book value of $10 million] 27 April 20X2: Receivable from sale of building 10,998,000 Building held for sale 10,000,000 Gain on disposal of building held for sale 998,000 [to record sale at $11.7 million, less 6% commission of $702,000] 1
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Accumulated Depreciation Question Description Discussion Assignment
Accumulated Depreciation Question Description Discussion Assignment