Comparing ROE and RNOA Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Comparing ROE and RNOA Case Study Assignment
Question Description
Accounting 3 Months Ended Mar. 30, 2019 Dec. 29, 2018 12 Months Ended Dec. 29, 2018 Dec. 28, 2019 Sep. 28, 2019 Jun. 29, 2019 Sep. 29, 2 Condensed consolidated Statements of Cash FIOWS – USD ($ in Billions Dec. 28, 2019 Dec. 29, 2018 Dec. 30, 2017 $ 1,933 $ (10, Dec. 28, 2019 Dec. 29, 2018 $2,279 1,973 $ 1,130 2,129 173 2,721 384 445 122 8,097 7,055 35,546 48,652 152 2,667 400 1,221 1, 1. Compare ROE and RNOA for the 2 years.
- Discuss how operating and nonoperating activities of your company contributed to each year’s shareholders’ overall return, ROE. • How did current year’s Net Operating Profit Margin (NOPM) change from last year? Identify several items that can explain the change. • How did current year’s Net Operating Asset Turnover (NOAT) change from last year?
Identify several items that can explain the change. 2. Compute Altman Z-score of your company for the recent 2 years (see Ch. 4 slide # 21 for the Z-score formula). How did your company’s bankruptcy probability change according to your computed Z-scores? For Market Value of Equity for the 2 years, use the numbers presented in the cover page of the most recent 2 years’ 10-K reports.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Comparing ROE and RNOA Case Study Assignment
Comparing ROE and RNOA Case Study Assignment