Administrative Law
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Description / paper instructions
Question: (problem scenario discussing and advising on the legal issues relevant to the scenario)Due to increased concern about potential terrorist attacks, new legislation is introduced significantly extending police powers to arrest and detain people suspected of terrorist activity. The (fictitious) New Terrorist Act 2019, provides powers to the police to enter the property of people suspected of planning terrorist attacks. It also gives powers for these people to be detained without charge or trial in high security prisons, but only if they are not British nationals. Those suspected of terrorist activities who are British are to be detained under house arrest, although hunderds of miles away from their own homes. The period of detention under the Act could be indefinite.
Within a week of the (fictitious) New Terrorist Act 2019 coming into force, 50 people in total, being 25 foreign nationals and 25 British nationals, are immediately arrested and taken to prison or put under house arrest, where they are not allowed to leave the premises under any circumstances.
All of these 50 people bring a joint case which proceeds to the UK Supreme Court. The 50 individuals are represented by human rights lawyers who argue that there has been a series of human rights breaches and want the UKSC to provide a remedy for their clients.
Advise the UKSC on whether:
1) There has been a breach of these individuals human rights; and
2) What sections of the Human Rights Act 1998 would be relevant in this case and why.Word Limit: 2000 words including footnotes, excluding bibliography. OSCOLA style
Sources advised to use only if you have a good knowledge of them:
John Stanton and Craig Prescott, Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2018) [Cite this book and cite it well my lecture is the author]
Neil Parpworth, Constitutional and Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 10th edn, 2018)
HWR Wade and CF Forsyth, Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 11th edn, 2014)
Brian Thompson and Michael Gordon, Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 12th edn, 2017)
problem scenarios discussing and advising on the legal issues relevant to the scenario.v
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Administrative Law
Administrative Law