Advisory Opinion for Your State Ethics Commission
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Advisory Opinion for Your State Ethics Commission
Mater’s level short paper
CHOOSE ONLY ONE:
Option A) You are on your state Ethics Commission and have been asked to provide an advisory opinion on the following: The agency director received an invitation to a golf outing sponsored by a party that is seeking
to do business with their agency. As part of the invitation they will provide the round fee, a cart, and dinner after the round. There are public and private officials that have been invited to the event. The director would
attend on non-work time and has not promised anything in return. Does the ethics law in your state allow this? What is the law? What are the implications of accepting this invitation? Does your state address golf
specifically or is it under their gift provisions? What would you do in this instance? Is there information that is not given that you would use in making the decision? Please draft an advisory response from the
Commission. Please back up your answer with at least three sources, one of which is your state regulation that covers this area. Your sources can be primary regulations, journals, or state websites such as that of
your Ethics Commission. Your response should follow the format of an advisory opinion such as the example below. The answer should be at least 5 pages in APA format (though the example is not).
Option B) You have been asked to write an advisory opinion for your State Ethics Commission. The requester is the assistant director for your state’s public library. The library has a policy of hiring substitute librarians
when someone is on leave and there is currently an opening. The assistant director’s mother has applied. There are over 100 other employees in the library system and this position does not report directly to the
assistant director. The hiring authority would be Human Resources but the assistant director would normally have final approval. Is there information that is not given that you would use in making the decision? Please
draft an advisory response from the Commission. Please back up your answer with at least three sources, one of which is your state regulation that covers this area. Your sources can be primary regulations, journals,
or state websites such as that of your Ethics Commission. Your response should follow the format of an advisory opinion such as the example below. The answer should be at least 5 pages in APA format (though the example is not).
Advisory Opinion for Your State Ethics Commission
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Advisory Opinion for Your State Ethics Commission