Android Design Updates Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Android Design Updates Discussion
Question Description
I’m working on a science multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Overview
So far in this course, you have explored many different mobile app examples, all of which have differed greatly from one another. Now that you have a stronger understanding of how this variance is underpinned by standard design best practices, you will start to explore tactics you would use to create your own mobile app UI.
In this assignment, you will select an app screen to re-create. This can be from an app you have already analyzed in this course, another app you are familiar with using, or a completely new app you found via research. Then, you will determine what you would change on the screen based on the understanding you have cultivated throughout this course regarding design best practices and translating the needs of users.
Prompt
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Design a user interface for a mobile app screen. On paper, or using a software of your choice (such as Microsoft PowerPoint), redesign one screen for a mobile app. The way you illustrate the design can be simple but it must include all the necessary elements for a user to complete the primary tasks the screen was designed for. However, the features you include should not necessarily be the same. Only the overall goal that addresses user needs must be maintained. While designing, you must do the following:
Include relevant features such as navigation components or information components.
Label every component and describe them, along with any data they collect or interact with.
Indicate which elements on the screen are interactive.
Apply mobile app UI design best practices. Be sure you continue to reference the Android Developers – Design for Android guidelines, linked in the Resources section of this module, as you work on your UI design. These are very comprehensive but it is important to use them in all aspects of design.
Justify your design decisions. Explain why you chose to make the UI design updates that you did for your creation. Your reasons should be user-driven and compatible with the Design for Android guidelines. Comment on any new features you introduced or any challenging areas you overcame with creative solutions.
Android Design Updates Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Android Design Updates Discussion
Android Design Updates Discussion