Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Applying a Force Field Strategies for Change Analysis
1) Review the PPT on “Strategies for Change” before completing this Discussion.
2) Think about a time when you experienced social or cultural change as part of an organization. You must be able to accurately recall the different factors affecting and influencing the change to successfully complete this discussion board.
3) Answer the following questions:
Briefly explain the social or cultural change that took place in your example.
Complete a “Force-Field Analysis” for your particular change.
A link to the form is found here: Force Field Analysis Worksheet-1.pdf Download Force Field Analysis Worksheet-1.pdf
What were the forces for change?
What were the forces against change?
How do the results of the Force-Field Analysis for this particular change explain what happened with the change?
This exercise helps one to connect the content to one’s own experience (especially with regard to how a “Force-Field Analysis” can help to explain a particular social or cultural change).
Applying a Force Field Strategies for Change Analysis
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Applying a Force Field Strategies for Change Analysis |
Applying a Force Field Strategies for Change Analysis