Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ART 1301 Renowned Spanish Visual Artist Picasso Discussion
Choose one visual artist that you find interesting. Using three different websites find information about your
chosen visual artist. Upload at least 3 examples of their work. In the accompanying essay, explain why you like the
work, information that you have learned about the artist and their technique and discussion whether the work has a social/political/cultural/historical or other personal meaning. This essay is not meant to be a biography. I am more
interested in why you are attracted to the work and what you personally think it is about and what you derive from
The Most Studied and Valued Forms of History in Europe Discussion
I’m trying to learn for my Art class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
Note the ways in which the prehistoric animals are depicted with greater detail than human figures, and look closely at the human figures as they first begin to appear. Then look at the use of architecture in the early cultures.
Write an essay briefly describing the differences between the two kinds of images–humans and animals–and propose reasons for these differences. How do these works of art figure into prehistoric societies? Why may they have been made? Discuss, very briefly, the functions of early architecture.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
ART 1301 Renowned Spanish Visual Artist Picasso Discussion |
ART 1301 Renowned Spanish Visual Artist Picasso Discussion