Assignment Article Social and Historical Context Assignment

March 21, 2022

Assignment Article Social and Historical Context Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Assignment Article Social and Historical Context Assignment

Find a newspaper, blog entry, or magazine article that discusses a topic related to our course. The article must be published on or after January 1, 2022.

Write a short summary of the article (3-5 sentences maximum). Then, explain how it relates to a specific course concept we have discussed in class. (A course concept maybe a vocabulary word, a theory, or even a research method or study results.) Your response should define the term and provide a detailed analysis of how the term, theory, or concept can help readers understand the article’s social and historical context. (This part should be 2-3 paragraphs long and the main focus of your response.

Your response should be 200-400 words total.

In your response, include a citation for the article. If the article is available online, include the URL/hyperlink to the article in your citation.

This response is worth up to 15 points and will be evaluated based on your understanding of the article and the course contents, your grammar/spelling, and proper use of citations.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met