Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Assignment for SOCW6520 personal safety plan
Reading Lists
J. Birkenmaier and M. Berg-Weger, M. Birkenmaier and J. Birkenmaier, J. Birkenmaier, J. Birkenmaier (2018). Integrating class and fieldwork with the social work practicum partner (4th ed.). Pearson, New York, New York, New York, New York, New York, New York, New
Safety in Social Work Settings is the third chapter in the book (pp. 63-77)
Massachusetts Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers (n.d.). Establishing a safe environment https://www.naswma.org/page/ Test SafetyLanding?&hhsearchterms=%22creating+and+climate+and+safety%22
G. D. Glancy and C. Regehr (2011). Risks, tactics, and legal protections for social workers who are stalked 232242 in Clinical Social Work Journal.
(Producer) Mandatory Media Laureate Education (2013i). [Audio file] Safety Planning https://class.waldenu.edu was used to retrieve this information.
This audio introduction can be found under “Introduction and Objectives.” This media item is around one minute in length.
Week 3 Blog Assignment #1
Use the resources from this week to incorporate the subjects into your blog.
Day 3: Write a blog article that contains the following information:
For your field education experience, a description of your personal safety plan
During your field education experience, an explanation of how your personal safety plan differs from the agency’s safety plan.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Assignment for SOCW6520 personal safety plan |
Assignment for SOCW6520 personal safety plan