Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Each student must develop the content for the final exam independently. This exam must be completed individually even if students may have developed a Group SMAC.
The final exam should be completed individually by each student in the class
Due date: July 20 (submit via canvas only by the due date)
Final SMAC due on or before July 27 (via canvas only)
Question 1: Individual Response
Develop a new resume to reflect the content that was reviewed in the discussion posting. Students should revise the resume to reflect the development that took place over the duration of the GMS program. Provide a before and after resume and provide a rationale for the changes that you have made. (1.33 points) (At least three pages, one for each resume and a discussion page)
Question 2: (Individual Response)
Cut and paste the results from the statistical test that was the most surprising result from your SMAC investigation. What were the most surprising results from your statistical output? Explain with examples (1 point). (½ page minimum). Be clear in your address with reference from the findings tables.
Question 3: (Individual Response)
Develop a table or figure to review all of the managerial abilities that were developed during each of the Seven Sessions in MGT
690 class. Clearly identify the managerial ability/ abilities that were developed in each session and provide a supportive review
of how you were able to develop the selected abilities during each class. Explain with examples how the class assignments and
other tools provided you with the opportunity to develop the selected managerial abilities. Think about how this exercise could
assist you professionally. (3 points) (1 page minimum) Illustrations plus review underneath minimum 1/1/2 pages. Provide
examples that are clear, not abstract or vague with a clear reflection of how the abilities were developed.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Final Exam Evaluation Questions Essay |
Final Exam Evaluation Questions Essay