Biology and Society Article Essay Questions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Biology and Society Article Essay Questions
In at least 250 words (total), address how Green’s Scientific American article aligns with the core principles of science communication and the tips we learned from Wu.
(1) Discuss how you believe Green’s article accounts for his audience using a particular framing and language by completing the following:
(a) Identify ONE audience you believe that Green was hoping to address.
(b) Identify the framing you believe Green chose, and discuss how he supported this framing through his language.
Note: Do not take up too much space with direct quotes from Green here. Rather, discuss how Green used language in his piece to support the framing you feel he chose, and do so using strategically-chosen–but short–direct quotes from the text if you wish.)
(2) Second, did Green’s article uphold any of the science communication tips we learned from Wu? Recall that the tips we learned involved getting rid of the ideas that communication gaps are due to knowledge; that there is finality in science; and that all communication is good communication.
(a) State whether or not you believe Green’s piece aligned with any of Wu’s tips. If YES, state the tip you think Green most aligned with (you need only mention ONE).
(b) Explain why you took the above stance.
If YES, briefly explain how you believe Green lived up to Wu’s suggestion.
If NO, briefly explain how you believe Green could have better lived up to one of Wu’s suggestions (you need only discuss one).
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-cant-scientists-talk-like-regular-humans/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-vision-for-the-next-decade-of-human-genomics-research/
Biology and Society Genome Editing Discussion Questions
In at least 250 words (total), and drawing on Gaieck et al. (2020), Sternberg et al. (2015), and (if you wish) any of the other knowledge you gained in this biology and society course, convince your Congresswoman–who has no training in science–that the NHGRI’s budget for genome editing work should be increased.
(1) State the framing for your request. (This could be a medical framing, an economic framing, a biological framing, or something else.) In other words, describe the broad reason why an increase in the NHGRI’s genome editing budget would be valuable for your local district OR the country at large.
(2) Using language you believe would be accessible to your Congresswoman provide evidence, from Gaieck et al. (2015) or any other Module in this course, that CRISPR research has shown promise in the lab in relation to the framing you provided. Note: You can think of this part of the assignment as flipping the audience of the Sternberg et al. (2015) piece from scientists to a policymaker.
(3) Explain to your Congresswoman how you plan on following up to evaluate whether your request to her has been effective.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow