Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report
Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report
Your EMGA Report will compile your hypotheses, finalized methods, data, analysis of the data, comparison of your data to your predictions, and your conclusions.
Background/Justification: You will likely use this section from your proposal as a first draft for this section. This section, less than one page, double-spaced, should provide background for your hypothesis. A top-scoring
background will explain the context of the experiment, and why this experiment is useful. It will be logical, organized into topically-organized paragraphs, and have perfect grammar and spelling.
Hypothesis or question(s): This section should clearly state what hypothesis(es) you will test or what question(s) you investigated. A top-scoring hypothesis or question will be logical and clear, and pose an interesting idea, as well
as have perfect grammar and spelling.
Methods: This section (up to two pages, double-spaced) should describe what methods you used, and how you analyzed your data. A top-scoring methods section will describe how the methods tested the hypothesis/answered
the question, and convince the reader that that the methods were well-controlled (protected from artifacts/other explanations for pattern). It will also be well-organized, with a clear structure, and perfect grammar and spelling.
Science Communication and Biology Discussion
In at least 100 words, describe how you think that science communication intersects with biology. You can make this as broad or specific as you would like! Comment on the responses of at least two of your peers
1: Science communication and biology do indeed share a correlation considering that both are applicable in each other’s field of study. I feel that science communication is the idea of sharing or spreading the knowledge of topics
that are science related. Biology is the study of life and is considered a life science which I can say with confidence uses science communication. We are all ca[able of spreading knowledge to our peers and it us up to them to
retain the information for their sake or interest. Publishing a paper on a topic that is newly discovered or highly debated is a form of communication. It allows readers to learn the information and analyze it themselves to formulate
their own premises.
2: Biology and science communication intersect in many areas. Science communication with the public is important, even more so with biology. Biologists make great efforts to communicate with the public and keep them
informed. This helps the public to continue supporting the biologists and to keep faith in Biology. Would Biology even be here without science communication with the general public? I certainly doubt it. People fear what they do
not understand, and they would certainly not fund any endeavors they fear. Biology would be nowhere near as advanced or influential without science communication. This is the most general but arguably the most important area
of intersection between the two. Thank you for reading.
Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report
Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow