Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Burton False Confession Discussion
I’m working on a science writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
For your oral presentation, you will apply these to a specific legal case which included a false confession. It must be a real case, which you can find through either the legal literature or from the popular media (newspaper story, news website, Innocence Project website, Wikipedia, etc.). The false confession must now be known to be false, but it doesn’t matter whether the confession was initially accepted by the jury/judge, and it doesn’t matter whether the suspect who made the false confession was found guilty or not, and it doesn’t matter what happened afterwards (exoneration, retrial, pardon, etc.).
For your presentation, you will need to:
Explain the facts of the case (what was the crime, how was the suspect found, etc.)
Describe the false confession (what the suspect confessed to having done)
Explain how we now know that the confession was false, in whole or in part
Given the facts of the interrogation and confession, describe the psychological processes that might have influenced this particular confession by this specific suspect (based on th
Burton False Confession Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Burton False Confession Discussion |
Burton False Confession Discussion