Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper on the Global Benefit System for Talented Employees
You’re an organizational development (OD) expert who specializes in non-leadership groups and movements. You are a member of the Organizational Development Professional Association (ODPA), a global organization whose membership has been continuously declining for the past five years. Last month, the ODPA’s board of directors (Board) conducted a member satisfaction survey, and the results were startling:
In light of the current environment, more than half of ODPA members question the organization’s relevance. Sixty-five percent of ODPA members are independent contractors or work for businesses with fewer than ten employees.
More than 30 percent of members had advanced degrees from 30 years or more ago, more than 50 percent from 10 to 29 years ago, and less than ten percent within the last nine years. Only about 5% of the participants could name one ODPA
Board member.
The ODPA executive director (Director) has contacted to see whether you can assist in light of the survey results. The Director, who is based in Toronto, Canada, is worried that the Board is out of touch with current organizational contexts, OD trends, and the growing issues that organizational development professionals face. The current Board of Directors is made up of individuals from Australia, England, Germany, Japan, and the United States. The Board meets once a year in
Toronto and once a quarter via web-based conference meetings.
As a critical step in raising a sense of urgency about the organization, the Director wishes to “inform” the Board. Otherwise, the Director is concerned that ODPA will not be able to continue. According to the Director, the Board of Directors:
Its leadership function is underappreciated.
Hasn’t embraced the changing demographics of the workforce, which have an impact on membership.
I’m having trouble understanding the differences between classical and autonomist leadership, as well as traditional versus developed leadership theory.
Does not comprehend contemporary leadership discourses.
The Director wants you to lead a Board discussion about organizational risks using the survey data as a springboard. The director has asked you to create a rough copy of the meeting agenda, which should include:
The meeting’s purpose (remember your audience)
Attendees and roles (consider the leader/follower positions of everyone in the room, including yourself.) As needed, make and record assumptions. Use scholarly references to back up your claims).
The timetable, the place, and the atmosphere (provide reasoned choices with support)
Material for pre-reading (Identify material that attendees should review ahead of the meeting; make and record assumptions as needed)
From 1920 to the present, a historical overview of the leadership field of study is presented (two to three pages)
Incorporate a unique graphic element (less than one-half page within body of the report; unlimited space in appendices)
Explanation of modern leadership in light of the current circumstances (three to four pages)
Incorporate a unique graphic element (less than one-half page within body of the report; unlimited space in Appendices)
Use one of Western’s (2013) four critical inquiry frames to analyze a current leadership book and its relevance to the circumstance (four to five pages)
Questions for the facilitators (design inquiry to draw attendees into a relevant discussion).
10 pages (explanation and answer)
Paper on the Global Benefit System for Talented Employees
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Paper on the Global Benefit System for Talented Employees |
Paper on the Global Benefit System for Talented Employees