Business Insider Trading at The Galleon Group Essay Solution 1

September 18, 2022

Business Insider Trading at The Galleon Group Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Business Insider Trading at The Galleon Group Essay

write a narrative essay in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least four (4) or more scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the learned concepts from the unit’s READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. The course textbook or READ section may be used as one of the scholarly sources. Provide properly formatted APA citations within the body of your essay as well as corresponding references at the end of your essay. Make sure your essay meets the minimum word-count before the reference list is added.

Refer to Case 12: Insider Trading at the Galleon Group

An employee at your organization has told you she suspects someone at your organization was involved in leaking information to Raj Rajaratnam. You decide to conduct an investigation to see whether these accusations are true. How will you conduct this investigation? When should you get the government involved, if at all?

Be sure to address:

Employee ethical responsibility

The effects of conducting an internal investigation in the Galleon network

How information gathering techniques can be better monitored

Refer to Case 13: Whole Foods Strives to be an Ethical Corporate Citizen

The Whole Foods CEO has been criticized for his blog posts about competitors as well as his open criticism of government actions. Some are calling for a boycott of Whole Foods products. As a company representative, how would you respond to consumers?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met