Business Model Canvas Peer Review Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Business Model Canvas Peer Review Essay
The person that was supposed to peer review my assignment did not peer review it. I have attached the Business Model Summary as well. I need at least 600-word summary and the Template done.
The purpose of this assignment is to create an updated version of the business model canvas template and summary based on feedback received from your peers, and faculty.
Utilize the “Business Model Canvas – Template and Intro” resource for your assignment. Completion of this assignment will include a completed “Business Model Canvas – Template and Intro” resource with all nine sections completed and an accompanying 600-word summary of the business model canvas. The written summary should include an improved hypothesis and persona.
Within your deliverable, be sure to apply the feedback provided in the Topic 6 Business Model Canvas Peer Review.
There are two deliverables for this task: the updated business model canvas template and the written summary of the business model canvas. You may submit these separately of combine them into one document.
The assignment must include at least five references.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results