Choosing a Career in the Judicial System
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Choosing a Career in the Judicial System
Assignment: Choosing a Career in the Judicial System
Lawyers make money—or so says one common opinion in society. While the law may offer a high earning potential, there are other reasons to practice law (and less lucrative areas of it). Consider that another word for lawyer is advocate, and to advocate means to represent and work for the interests of another. Whether that means advocating for the collective good of citizens (i.e., the government) or to ensure that every person in the judicial system receives representation (i.e., the defense), working in the judicial system in numerous areas can be a vocation, motivated by a desire to serve the public.
In this Assignment, you imagine that you have been called to deliver a presentation at a nearby law school in which you discuss the standards, ethics, and merits of a career in the judicial system.
To upload your video presentation for this Assignment, use the Kaltura Media option from the mashup tool drop-down menu. Refer to the Kaltura Media Uploader area in the course navigation menu for more information about how to upload media to the course.
THIS IS A VIDEO PRESENTATIONS THAT I WILL SPEAK ON SO I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO TURN THIS INTO A 750 WORD ESSAY COVERING ALL THE QUESTIONS AND TOPICS BELOW THAT ARE HIGHLIGHTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE AND PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU REFERENCE YOUR WORK AND PLEASE READ EVERYTHING FROM TOP TO BOTTOM SO YOU WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO PUT THE ESSAY TOGETHER THANKS……
Submit a Kaltura video of delivering a presentation that follows the guidelines below. Your video should be no longer than 5 minutes.
You have been called to deliver a presentation at a nearby law school. Your goal is to enlist new law students into working within the district attorney’s office or as public defenders after graduation. Your presentation must address the following:
How can each position—district attorney or defense attorney—be viewed as more than just a job or a steppingstone?
How is each position valuable to the community?
Why and how is each position necessary?
What makes each position effective?
What makes each position different?
What are the positive and negative aspects of each position?
How does each position depend on each other for the system to function? How do they work together despite the adversarial relationship?
Follow these tips for delivering a professional presentation:
Dress professionally and conduct yourself as if you are in a professional setting with peers and supervisors.
Be sure to maintain eye contact as if you were speaking in front of your audience.
Finally, be sure to record yourself in a room that is quiet and where no one interrupts you.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow