CJA 416 UOP Wk 2 Political Science Budget Proposal & Explanation Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
CJA 416 UOP Wk 2 Political Science Budget Proposal & Explanation Paper
Content
In Week 2, you developed a budget strategy to address a budget issue. you further develop the details and create your budget proposal for the criminal justice agency you selected. As you work on your proposal, keep in mind the requirements for accurate reporting discussed in Week 2. These should be built into your budget as “guardrails” to maintain consistently accurate reporting. You have explored the residual effects of poorly structured budgets and a lack of complete reporting. Include ways you can protect your budget against the effects of inaccurate or incomplete reporting. Implement the feedback received from your Wk 2 – Summative Assessment: Budget Proposal Strategy as you build your budget proposal.
Refer to the budget examples you researched in your Wk 2 assignment and locate any additional examples to help inform your budget.
Write your budget proposal. Address the following:Create a complete cost worksheet detailing the costs included in your budget.
Explain your proposal recommendation in detail.
Address how your budget proposal will perform against the budget issue you have identified.
Describe how you can maintain accurate and complete reporting of your budget. What guardrails have you set up?
Include an overview of the different budget sources you used as examples for your budget. Were these examples civilian-created or police-created?
Explain any potential issues with the use of centralized budgeting in the examples you referenced.
Explain any trends you noticed in the examples you referenced.
CJA 416 UOP Wk 2 Political Science Budget Proposal & Explanation Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow