COM 380 Violence Articles Review Paper

October 6, 2022

COM 380 Violence Articles Review Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

COM 380 Violence Articles Review Paper

*Wesley Lowery, “A Reckoning over Objectivity, Led by Black Journalists,” The

New York Times, June 23, 2020. link

*Alexandria Neason, “Officials Say: In Chicago and Elsewhere, Police

Departments Plant Misinformation in the Press,” Columbia Journalism Review,

Robert M. Entman and Andrew Rojecki, “Violence, Stereotypes and African-

Americans in the News,” from The Black Image in the White Mind, 2001.

These are a few articles, you need to look for them on the Internet, and then write about 50-100 words for each article or what kind of opinion do you have

COM 380 Best Candidate for The Position of A TV Producer Table

Speech topic: tv producer

To persuade my audience that i would be a great candidate for tv producer.

For this speech, you will identify your dream job, research the industry you would like to work in (employment trends, etc.) and finally the characteristics of a successful person in the role of your choosing. You would then match up your own characteristics and experience in your speech to persuade your audience that you would be the perfect candidate for the position.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met