Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
COM 4322 UEFA Europa League Essay PPT
Content Creation/Evaluation Assignment
This class has focused on the ability to retrieve, evaluate, utilize, share and create content. As discussed in the textbook, lectures and throughout the semester, one of the features of Web 2.0 (Links to an external site.) is a focus on user-generated content (Links to an external site.), participatory culture (Links to an external site.) and interoperability for end users. The ability to create and contribute to content continues to change and become easier for more individuals.
This assignment addresses all the aspects of media/technological literacy from this class with a focus on creating content. Perhaps Wikipedia (Links to an external site.) is one of the strongest examples of Web 2.0 and application of media/technological literacy. For this assignment you will complete a 3-4 minute video presentation of how you expanded a “stub (Links to an external site.)” on Wikipedia.
Starting with Wikipedia you must first look for a stub (Links to an external site.) (incomplete article on Wikipedia). All stub articles on Wikipedia are classified as so and contain the following text at the bottom of the page “article is a stub”
You can search Wikipedia to find a stub article by going directly to Wikipedia and searching topics you have an interest in.
Or you can use easier search methods that were taught in Module 2. For example
In Google (Links to an external site.) or Duck Duck Go (Links to an external site.) (DDG), keyword(s) “article is a stub” site:en.wikipedia.org
Or even more specific “article is a stub” “your topic of interest here” site:en.wikipedia.org
Thus if I used DDG and searched “article is a stub” “baseball” site:en.wikipedia.org (Links to an external site.)
The first result I would find is the “Baseball5”
After finding an stub to edit, you need to create an account. When you do, you will have a user page.
COM 4322 UEFA Europa League Essay PPT
You must create an account and sign in or you will not receive credit for the assignment. This is because I must be sure you completed the edits. If you are signed in, then all your edits are recorded under your account name. This allows me to see how versions are different. It will lead to a page like this (Links to an external site.), which lists contributions.
Then you are required to take an existing article stub and expand it. You will be required to make an argument for the quality and quantity of your expansion to the stub. Argue why you have contributed enough that the stub status should be removed. The following page (Links to an external site.) should provide you with information and links to help make this argument.
First, begin with an explanation of the stub you are editing and why you choose it. Provide a description of why this is interesting to you and why you believe the stub needs to be expanded. Why would anyone care about this content when there is so much information/content out there to access? Then discuss who would be interested in reading the article and why? What is the importance of it?
Next explain what changes you made and why the changes you made improve the stub. Make sure to explain what content you linked to and why this is important. Do you believe you created enough content to remove the stub status? Why? What did you leave out of your content and why? Consider using elements from previous units in this class and the textbook to strengthen your discussion. You will want to include an image of your user contributions page.
Then remember from the Media Skills video there are four things to look out for in content, they are Relevance, Accuracy, Bias and Reliability. Address and evaluate how each of these relate to the content you created.
In conclusion bring the project together. Explain why content creation is important amd the value that you continued through expanding this stub. Remember this video must be between 3-4 minutes. Please also consult the rubric for specific point allocation.
If you have never edited a Wikipedia page before, below are two links that offer some beginning instructions.
How to edit a Wikipedia article 1 (Links to an external site.)
How to edit a Wikipedia article 2 (Links to an external site.)
Also remember you must create your user page in Wikipedia, this page tells you how (Links to an external site.)
R
5 attachments
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
COM 4322 UEFA Europa League Essay PPT