Common Core Aligned Lesson Plan Template
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Common Core Aligned Lesson Plan Template
Subject(s): ______________________________________________ Grade: ______________
Teacher(s): ______________________________________ School: __________________
LESSON ELEMENT STUDENT-FRIENDLY TRANSLATION ( # 2,3,4 only)
1. Common Core Learning Standard(s) Addressed: 2. Learning Target(s): (What will students know & be able to do as a result of this lesson?) 3. Relevance/Rationale: (Why are the outcomes of this lesson important in the real world? Why are these outcomes essential for future learning?) 4. Formative Assessment Criteria for Success: (How will you & your students know if they have successfully met the outcomes? What specific criteria will be met in a successful product/process? What does success on this lesson’s outcomes look like?) 5. Activities/Tasks: (What learning experiences will students engage in? How will you use these learning experiences or their student products as formative assessment opportunities?) 6. Resources/Materials: (What texts, digital resources, & materials will be used in this lesson?) 7. Access for All: (How will you ensure that all students have access to and are able to engage appropriately in this lesson? Consider all aspects of student diversity.) 8. Modifications/Accommodations: (What curriculum modifications and/or classroom accommodations will you make for Students with Disabilities in your class? Be as specific as possible.) Common Core Aligned Lesson: Reflection
This section should be reviewed for WEEK TWO analysis only.
Students will NOT complete this section if this template is selected for the assignments during weeks 3 and 4.
- Does this lesson reflect one of the “shifts” in instruction (see Common Core “Shifts” documents on EngageNY.org)? If so, please describe which shift is addressed and how?
- In addition, please choose ONE question below to respond to after you have taught the lesson OR create your own question and respond to it after you have taught the lesson.
- How did this lesson support 21st Century Skills?
- How did this lesson reflect academic rigor?
- How did this lesson cognitively engage students?
- How did this lesson engage students in collaborative learning and enhance their collaborative learning skills?
You are also encouraged to use a facilitated “Learning from Student Work” protocol to review and reflect on student work related to this lesson.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Common Core Aligned Lesson Plan Template