Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

Instructions:

Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

Week 6 Discussion – Responsibility

Whose responsibility is it to communicate pricing to patients (hospitals, government, insurance companies, physicians, others)?

POST

Read: Play Week 6 Overview PowerPoint ALEXANDER, SHERI. “Next Steps and New Tools: Transparency and Reference-Based Pricing.” Employee Benefit Plan Review 68.5 (2013): 20-21. in Course Resources>eReserves Lambert Paul. Haggard, Mary, “Develop your distribution strategy”, Managed Healthcare Executive. May 15, 2013.  Available online at: https://www.managedhealthcareexecutive.com/exclusives/develop-your-distribution-strategy Online Text:  Core Concepts in Marketing — https://web.archive.org/web/20170829021853/https://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Core-Concepts-of-Marketing.pdfChapter 9, “Pricing the product” Chapter 10, “Channel concepts, distributing the product”

Health & Medical Discussion

*** Comment this ***
Your analysis and explanation of your opinion is excellent. When described that way it is hard to see how anyone could argue this stance. If we approve euthanasia because someone claims they are suffering, we have to include those who claim to suffer from mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. But, are they stable enough to make such a choice?

And if we exclude mental health suffering from the euthanasia option, that means were are defining and putting parameters on suffering, which as you said is subjective like a pain scale rating.

Health & Medical Discussion

*** Comment this ***

You bring up a good point. We often fail to consider the fact that other patients and their families are also affected by the deaths they witness or hear about during their admission. And unlike healthcare workers and first responders, many of them may have never had to face death before. Patients often ask me about the health of other patients, and they express concern about those patients’ wellbeing. Of course, I can offer no information on the subject, but only an assurance that we do everything we can to help. I imagine the stress of being at an inpatient hospice facility or ICU or ER would make that scenario even more difficult for patients and their families.

Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

Communicating Pricing to Patients Responsibility Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!