Communications the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck Orientation Values

October 5, 2022

Communications the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck Orientation Values

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Communications the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck Orientation Values

1) Identify cultural patterns that apply to the culture-Choose one of the cultural patterns or cultural pattern typologies that your book describes and assess your culture (choose one of Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Value Orientations, High-Context/Low-Context, one of Hofstede’s Value Dimensions, one of Minkov’s Cultural Dimensions, etc…you do not have to choose one from each, just choose one cultural pattern/value/orientation/typology from the book that you think best fits or describes your culture).

2) Describe the use of language (both what languages are used, by whom, and how they are used in terms of language patterns/practices) within the culture

3) Explain the use of nonverbal communication (patterns and behaviors) within the culture. Keep in mind that nonverbal communication includes many things (appearance, body movement, space and distance, etc.).

Communications the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck Orientation Values

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met