Los Angeles Pierce Ma Film Discussion Essay

October 5, 2022

Los Angeles Pierce Ma Film Discussion Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Los Angeles Pierce Ma Film Discussion Essay

Analyze a specific mediated text.

First, choose a mediated text to analyze. This could be a music video, tv show, or movie (must be produced after 2018). Do not choose “This Is America” or The Joker. Additionally, please do not choose an artifact that bloggers on the internet have already overanalyzed.

If you choose a music video, don’t just focus on the song lyrics. Also, don’t just focus on the visuals. Should focus on BOTH.

Then, write a 3–4-page essay, by answering the questions:

Provide a brief description of the mediated text.

Analyze your text by providing a dominant, negotiated, and oppositional reading. When analyzing you should include:

What is the intended message? How did the producers intend for the text to be read?

What ideologies or messages are being represented in the text?

What ideologies or messages are not being represented in the text?

Refer to specific example(s) from the mediated text

What is an alternative interpretation of the text?

What is your reading of the text? Is it more dominant, negotiated, or oppositional? Explain why.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met