Communications Writing Reading Response Essay

October 5, 2022

Communications Writing Reading Response Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Communications Writing Reading Response Essay

I’m working on a communication writing question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Select 3-4 quotes from any of the readings that resonated with you (either because of the insight or

explanation they provide) from at least 2 of the assigned readings. Students should describe the context of
the quotes in relation to the rest of the article as well as why you chose those particular passages.

2 attachments

Why Relationships Are Going Digital Essay

Objective: Relationships can fill our lives with connection and belonging, and heartache and frustration. Utilizing a specific theoretical perspective for this paper, you will offer a synthesis of the current research on a chosen relationship type, a common problem that occurs in this relationship (supported by evidence), and a solution to that problem in accordance with the research of your theory.

Problem: Use Different Communication Theory’s and concepts to talk about how relationships are going digital, how COVID has caused this, or how the development of technology has caused this, and the Problems that come along with this.

Literature Review A literature review is a synthesis of existing research on a particular topic (in this case, a theory, relationship type, and/or relationship problem). This review should provide important context for the argument that you will make later in the paper on how to solve this problem.

It’s important to remember that the literature review should integrate and analyze and integrate ideas together rather than individually reviewing each source. Typically, lit reviews are organized thematically and come before your argument. Lastly, your literature review should show how your argument will fit into the past and present research.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met