Compare and Contrast the Different Cultural Groups
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Compare and Contrast the Different Cultural Groups
View markup for Org 6499 week 5 assingment.docx
Michael, over all you did very well in this paper. However, choosing both race and gender to discuss was very difficult to follow. I recommend that you choose just one for your final paper and delve into it deeply. Also, I urge you to utilize language that is similar for people of all races who are Americans. For example, African Americans, European Americans, Latinx Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans. Thank you.
( 1.06 / 1.20) Identifies and Analyzes a Current Diversity Situation or Cultural Dilemma Involving More Than One Group, the Historical Perspectives of the Situation or Dilemma, and Current Day Situation, Including Explanation of Interest
Proficient – Fairly identifies, analyzes, and explains a current diversity situation or cultural dilemma with reason for interest.
( 1.06 / 1.20) Compare and Contrast the Different Cultural Groups. 1. What Cultural Groups are Involved in this Situation or Dilemma? 2. What Stereotypes and Biases are Associated with Each of These Cultural Groups? 3. What Privileges and Power are Associated With Each of These Cultural Groups?
Proficient – Fairly compares and contrasts the different cultural groups, explaining stereotypes, biases, privileges, and power associated with each.
( 1.20 / 1.20) Determines a Personal Position Regarding the Topic and Present at Least One Argument Supporting and at Least One Argument Opposing the Topic
Distinguished – Clearly presents a personal position and arguments in support and in opposition of the topic.
( 1.20 / 1.20) Illustrates How the Situation or Dilemma can be Addressed Moving Forward for a Mutually Beneficial Outcome
Distinguished – Clearly illustrates how the situation or dilemma can be addressed moving forward for a mutually beneficial outcome.
( 0.70 / 0.80) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.80 / 0.80) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
( 1.60 / 1.60) Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Overall Score: 7.62 / 8.00
Overall Grade: 7.62
Compare and Contrast the Different Cultural Groups
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results