Conference Apps Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Conference Apps Discussion Essay Assignment
Exercise Content
Assignments (select only one subject from the two options below):
1 – Write a Word document where you will focus on conference apps like BB Collaborate and Zoom, and other web-based similar resources (minimum of 150 words).
2 – Write a Word document where you will consider Hypothetical scenarios illustrating examples of protected speech that exceeds the limits of speech (minimum of 150 words).
- Describe how you think that writing for the web is different from writing a report
- Define the term solutions architect in your own words and describe how it differs from a software developer
- Define COTS software and give an example of one that you might use as a student
- Describe the difference between a BRS and a FRS
- Describe the main differences between the Waterfall model and the Incremental model
- What activities occur in the requirements definition process and where does it occur in the sequence of software engineering tasks
- Define verification and validation, highlighting the differences
- Describe the highest level of maturity in the CMMI model
- There are many different types of software applications, give an example of embedded, webapp, and mobile apps and discuss some of the characteristics that make them different
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Conference Apps Discussion Essay Assignment
Conference Apps Discussion Essay Assignment