Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Contemporary Social Problems and Integrative Solutions Essay
This assignment will demonstrate your ability to break down assumptions and values of at least two disciplinary arguments surrounding a problem. You should be able to recognize disciplinary approaches as well as perceptions of the processes as they are interpreted by you and your group mates.
Use the skills you learned in the lessons related to ethical consciousness and perspective taking to help you account for the process of identifying disciplinary and value laden perspectives on the problem.
In the exercise you will map the complexity of perspectives on the problem. You will align perspectives with at least two disciplinary approaches to research the problem and other factors that build perceptions of the problem.
You will describe how the integration of perspectives is possible through the identification of common and aligned perspectives represented by the disciplines in your Annotated Bibliography and Peer Review assignments.
Criteria for Success
This is it! This assignment is the culmination of all lessons and assignments of the course. It is the assignment that will demonstrate your mastery of the skills and values of interdisciplinarity. You should review the progress you have made related to the understanding and use of our core skills: Perspective taking, appreciation for diversity, intellectual dexterity, and critical thinking. Also be ready to unpack ALL of your cognitive tool kit. Skills such as ethical consciousness and metacognition will be called upon. Know what these skills are and articulate how you used them.
Use your skills for collaboration and appreciation for diversity to heighten your creativity. The diversity of perspectives can be found in the annotated bibliographies in the group site. The explanations in the annotations and your peer review will explain the various perspectives from the disciplines as well as the perspectives of your group mates. Use these as much as possible.
Reference the Annotated Bibliography discussion board. Use the annotated bibliographies and your peer review to support your work. You will reference the information on the group page, but the completion of this map is done individually. All of the following instructions will be done individually and turned in individually through the assignment portal.
Formatting your map
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Contemporary Social Problems and Integrative Solutions Essay |
Contemporary Social Problems and Integrative Solutions Essay