Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Contract Finalization and Scheduling Tool Software Discussion
What kind of contract will you pursue for each of the following purchases related to this project?
Hiring technicians to install and configure the software for your environment
Hiring a training entity to teach the student PMs the mechanics of using the new tool
Buying a new server and software to run the tool and house the project database
Hiring tool usage experts to transfer knowledge to the student PMs about the use of the tool on the job for the first 60 days after going live
Planning for the removal and disposal of the scheduling tool software and hardware that are no longer to be used
Assignment Guidelines
In 600–750 words, address the following for each of the 5 bulleted items listed in the assignment description:
Which contract type is the most appropriate for the product or service purchase?
How would you effectively justify your selection to other project managers?
What arguments might they use to debate your selection?
How would you effectively address those arguments?
What risks are associated with the type of contract selected?
Explain exactly how you factored these risks into your selection.
What general purposes and functions does the contract type address?
How does the selected contract meet the project objectives?
Explanation & Answer:
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Contract Finalization and Scheduling Tool Software Discussion |
Contract Finalization and Scheduling Tool Software Discussion