Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Risk of a Financial Crisis Response Essay
Make a comment about the article below1 to explain why you agree this opinion.
around 100 words
How should the EU respond when a country threatens to default on its sovereign debt?
When countries default on their sovereign debt, they increase the risk of a financial crisis. A crisis similar to the 2008 financial crisis, which crippled so many industries, would follow. Again, think of the role banks play in the matters of sovereign debt. Since banks are central to holding the sovereign debt, it can only be expected that significantly huge losses would accrue. These losses would trigger other effects such as rising Libor rates (Paulus, 2013).
The EU’s response in cases where countries threaten to default should be focused on preventing a financial crisis which could even be a threat to the survival of the EU itself. Enforcing the application of the permanent bailout fund would be a good means in assuring member countries and lenders that the EU is keen on standing behind its members. When threats of default come, the EU needs to act fast, now that member countries have the right to grant budgetary power to centralized EU control (Kilpatrick, 2018). In some cases, the EU may use bailouts.
Should the EU be concerned when a country leaves the EU because of the ‘default’?
A country could mitigate the threat of a sovereign default by issuing currency, but EU members lose the right to issue currency because of the common monetary policy. Even with financial aid from the EU, the crisis in Greek has not fundamentally solved. Thus, when a country leaves the EU due to the ‘default’, other EU members may be disappointed by the EU’s response and worry about the shortcomings of the regional monetary policy. In the face of finical crises, it could lead to the collapse of the EU.
Kilpatrick, C. (2018). Abnormal Sources and Institutional Actions in the EU Sovereign Debt Crisis—ECB Crisis Management and Sovereign Debt Loans. Oxford Scholarship Online. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198817468.001.0001/oso-9780198817468-chapter-4
Paulus, C. G. (2013). A Resolvency Proceeding for Defaulting Sovereigns. Collective Action Clauses and the Restructuring of Sovereign Debt. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110314526/
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Risk of a Financial Crisis Response Essay |
Risk of a Financial Crisis Response Essay