Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Assignment
Description
Slide #10 in the PowerPoint slide for Chp. 12 lists a number of alternatives for businesses to move forward with social responsibility (such as Conscious Capitalism and Social Entrepreneurship). . Study these strategies (use the links provided in the slide and do some research on your own – make sure to cite if used), and present what you think would be the best solution and why?
this is what slide # 10 contain, and on the bottom the link that I have to watch.
Social Entrepreneurship: What it is
Starting ventures with the main goal of making a difference to society (not profit). E.g. Toms Shoes
Creation of For Benefit B – Corporations
Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) Strategies
Method: Focus on worlds poorest as a viable market
Shared Value (Porter & Kramer, 2011)
Creating value for customers and other stakeholders
Similar to BOP. E.g. Nestle, India. Cisco Academy
Conscious Capitalism (Sisodia, Mackey)
The 4 Principleshttps://www.entrepreneur.com/article/246478
Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Assignment
Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Assignment