Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Answer each of the following questions clearly and concisely in no more than half a double-spaced typed page. (For the header and footer, use 12 point Times New Roman with one-inch margins.) Any part of your answer that exceeds this space limit will not be given credit.
You don’t have to rephrase the question or formulate a thesis statement if you simply answer it (citing the question number).
If you collaborate on your answers, you must write them entirely in your own words. You will automatically fail if the language of your answer is even remotely similar to that of another student.
Is there a moral distinction between the “bridge” and “switch” versions of the Trolley Problem? Explain.
Give an ethical response to the “Covid Trolley Problem.” Consider and respond to a counter-argument to your proposed solution.
Demonstrate Adam Smith’s perspective on money. Explain why A. Mitchell-Innes is opposed to it.
How is money, according to Hockett and James, both a promise and usually backed by the threat of prison?
What, according to Sandel, is the difference between money arguments about “fairness” and “corruption”? Make sure to give both examples.
What does Nguyen mean by “value capture,” and how are games and money similar in terms of motivating us? How does money, in his opinion, distort our values?
How and why can anything necessary and technologically possible for climate change adaptation be paid for, according to Hockett and James?
Apart from what other people do and any collective obligations we may have, are we personally obligated to reduce our emissions to zero? Justify your actions.
Explain why, in light of Nordhaus, a utilitarian might argue that we are obligated to make significant sacrifices for the sake of future generations. Explain why, in Broome’s or James’ opinion, we should seek “efficiency” instead. (Be sure to define the term “efficiency” in this context.)
Explain the differences between “green growth,” “degrowth,” and “a-growth” positions with examples.
What is a circular economy, and how does it work? Explain how money or other credit/debt relationships might facilitate it, based on Raworth’s discussion.
Explain why our natural environment is valuable in Naess’ opinion. It does, according to Routely’s argument. Consider his argument.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Covid Trolley Problem Discussion, Moral Difference Scenarios |
Covid Trolley Problem Discussion, Moral Difference Scenarios