Crafting Thoughtful Questions for Our Alumni Speakers
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Crafting Thoughtful Questions for Our Alumni Speakers
Review the following information about our invited alumni guest speakers: The speakers will not spend much time discussing who they are or what they do during this meeting. Instead, you are expected to familiarize yourself with their paths and current jobs before the meeting occurs so that time can be dedicated to answering your submitted questions and engaging in meaningful dialogue during the meeting itself.
Guest Speakers:
Robert Lara (Graduated in 2021)
Zoe King (Graduated in 2021)
To aid in creating an engaging and informative discussion, you will write at least one question you would like to ask each of our guest speakers. Before you write the question, please review any materials provided by the invited guest speakers (i.e., the website of the workplace, a LinkedIn profile, a resume, etc.) so that the question can be thoughtful and relevant. The questions you write must be specific in some way to each of the panelists
Crafting Thoughtful Questions for Our Alumni Speakers
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |