Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Create A New Staff Development Plan
Step One
Given that you have read and studied chapters 7 and 8, reread the focus scenario in chapter 7 on pp. 206 – 207 and the focus scenario in chapter 8 on page 248. Post your responses to the following prompts in the discussion forum.
Step Two
During this module, we will also look more closely at things that are involved in teacher evaluation systems, including value-added data and processes for removing teachers who fail to perform to standard. This week, we will do some reading from the textbook for some general background and read an article that considers teachers’ perspectives in regard to value-added.
For this discussion forum, please read the following:
The text – Advent of Value-Added Performance Evaluation (pp. 207-208).
The article – Anticipating and Incorporating Stakeholder Feedback When Developing Value-Added Models . This article focuses on Baltimore City Public Schools (BCPS), but I believe it will be good for you to read because it includes information about the following:
In the discussion forum, respond to the following:
The text…
The article…
Synthesis…
Create A New Staff Development Plan
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Create A New Staff Development Plan |
Create A New Staff Development Plan